Collaborative Innovation – Primed Associates is a Contributing Blogger

The Collaborative Innovation site is an editorially independent thought leadership community around Business & Collaborative Innovation.  It is sponsored by Dassault Systèmes and produced by Human 1.0. Primed Associates’ CEO/Principal, Drew Marshall, has been invited to contribute.

Collaborative Innovation, has been defined by the originator of the term, Peter Gloor (a Research Scientist at MIT Sloan’s Center for Collective Intelligence) as “a cyberteam of self-motivated people with a collective vision, enabled by the Web to collaborate in achieving a common goal by sharing ideas, information, and work.”

It is a topic that is written and talked about around the world and they decided to offer a place where thought leaders could expand the landscape.  The blog, in conjunction with the Dassault Systèmes Customer Conference 2011 (DSCC) aims to drive and deepen the conversation.

Here are links to the series of posts by Primed Associates’, Drew Marshall, at Collaborative Innovation:

A Twofer from a Hurricane: How Transportation Innovation Might Transform the Energy Sector

Too Smart For Our Own Good: Why choosing wisely is critical in innovation

Placing Innovation Bets: 5 Lessons from 5 Big Players

3d Modeling at Scale – From Aircraft to Embroidery

Launching FashionLab – (ad)dressing haute couture, jewelry and beyond

Trends in Retail Pointing to Innovations in Services

Take a look at Drew’s and others’ posts, there’s lots of great food for thought and participate in the conversation.

Read More

Business Innovation Factory – 7 #BIF7 – Live blogging Sept 21

See Day 1 here. A big thanks to John Werner at Citizen Schools for sharing some of his fantastic photos from BIF-7.

To start the day off I had a great conversation with seat mate and recovering journalist, Helen Walters from Doblin. We covered: Conferences. Curation. Presentation delivery bar being raised. And the Conference Industrial Complex. I love her manner of inquiry.

Saul Kaplan opened the day by reflecting on what the success of the BIF summit means. He noted, “People need to draw their own conclusions because the value is in what you learn as a participant.” Saul also reflected on the fact that innovators, even though they come with deep subject matter expertise, are in constant search for what they are missing. This mindset is something that informs how Roger Martin, Dean of the Rotman School of Business at the University of Toronto thinks about innovation and to whom Saul nodded.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Umair Haque, Director of the Havas Media Lab and author of The New Capitalist Manifesto: Building a Disruptively Better Business, lead the Day 2 presentations by delivering his session live from Pakistan. We talked yesterday about transforming education and healthcare. Haque is focused on transforming the mother of all systems, capitalism.

Haque opened with the fact that Pakistan has ground to a halt due to an outbreak of Denge Fever.

What the religious fundamentalists haven’t been able to achieve in two decades, the mosquitoes have accomplished in two months in Lahore. – Umair Haque

He stated that Pakistan is a functional economy against which he compared the aspirational economy of India. By way of framing his approach to capitalism, Haque quoted from Joseph Shcumpeter’s work, “Can Capitalism Survive?” Schumpeter’s assessment was that no, capitalism cannot survive because the range of needs of human beings is endless and that it will collapse under its own weight. Haque’s additional framing is to offer the concept of the opulent economy and its attendant ills: dumbification, inequity, social unrest, abject poverty. The quest for more, bigger, faster, cheaper, now is going to fade.

In the place of opulence, Haque offers up a model of capitalism based on fitter, smarter, tougher, closer, and wiser. The term he uses is eudaimonia which is founded in “human flourishing.” This transition will take years, if not a decade according to Haque. However the range of change required is transformational

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The artist, screenwriter, and author behind “The Polar Express” and many other books, Chris Van Allsburg came to the stage next. He shared a story about Annie Edson Taylor, the first woman to go over Niagara Falls in a barrel. [It should be mentioned I have a relative who self-selected from the gene pull by swimming the river that feeds these Falls, Captain Webb who was a British dare devil.] Van Allsburg’s book is called, “Queen of the Falls”

In sharing his journey to creating this book, Van Allsburg talked about the narrative choices he made in conjunction with the illustrative choices, such as superimposing a building into the Falls to illustrate their size. He also discussed how he fleshed out her life’s story and how he captured her journey to the moment she decided to go over the Falls in a barrel. She had no experience in barrel-making or dare-devilry and yet, like most innovators, she had a persistent belief in her own vision and the will to drive it to successful completion.

This presentation offered a glimpse into both the subject of Van Allsburg’s heroine as well as the author artist’s role in capturing her journey in a meaningful and accessible manner. To see and hear how he pulled together the elements of his book into a cohesive whole was intriguing. It was a wonderful and revealing view of the care required to construct meaning.

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Alexander Osterwalder was a pinch-hitter due to the schedule shift on Day 1 with Erin Mote being called away by Secretary of State, Hilary Clinton, to go to the West Bank. Alex is the lead author/editor of the book, “Business Model Generation”  which was essentially co-created with a large number of practitioners.

This book arose from Alex’s doctoral thesis which contained the word ontology, which Alex noted is the word that enables you to earn a Ph.D! The first time the book was able to be held by Alex was actually at BIF5 two years ago. And with book in hand Alex found that he struggled to define himself when asked by people – author?, entrepreneur?, public speaker?, academic? None of which seemed to fit. Instead he says he is,

I’m somebody who likes to *break* the rules and make stuff.

Alex provided some statistics to create context for the environment into which his book might be delivered. 1,000,000 books published in English in a year. 11,000 of those are business books. Cumulatively there are 250,000 business books competing for shelf-space. Business books sell 250 copies on average. A highly challenging environment in which to launch a new book.

He identified some of the challenges of business books which sounded like an offshoot of the Goldilocks tale: too heavy, too light, to wordy, to impractical. To break this paradigm Alex and the wider team looked at a very broad range of works for inspiration and sought to cerate a book that they would love to buy. The first step was to hire a designer and assemble a broader team to create and build the ecosystem around the development of the book. The end result is a highly visual book with white space and different ways of laying out the book to engage and attract to ensure the book had a high degree of utility.

The book became the co-created work of 470 people around the world. They also charged for participation and raised the price of the book time and time again from $24 to $81. The last chance payment was $250 in order to have your name in the book before publication. What was the reason for the attractiveness of the value proposition? Being first. Being a part of something bigger. An opportunity to learn from each other.

Instead of a marketing budget, the book project had a built in community of people who were proud advocates for the book in the marketplace. The backbone for bringing the book to light was the internet. There was a freemium offer of a third of the book. Then came the challenge of managing the logistics of dealing with shipping all over the way. The initial approach with a Dutch company was an abject failure and then they went back to Amazon for fulfillment. The initial success attracted a large publisher, Wiley.

The book is available around the world and it has been scheduled to be translated into 22 other languages. The ideas are available around the world and are tearing down the barriers to business everywhere.

This was a great example of building a community to launch a book to the heights of success.

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The Co-Founder of Futurlogic, Jon Cropper next came up to talk about seduction a distillation of 15 years of his life into 15 minutes. And he survived being tortured by P-Diddy running his company for a year. He shared nine elements that drive seduction:

Self awareness – know yourself

Environmental – the conditions and context of performance

Design – aesthetics matter (the fusion of a simple exterior with a complex interior – “simplexity”)

Understanding – listening and compassion

Communication – the power of great storytelling

Trust – in others and delivering on your promise

Inspiration – create an educational, inspirational operating philosophy

Open – generosity feeds the soul

New – rejuvenation, repetition and constant renewal

Cropper offered a series of personal anecdotes and observations that revealed those things that resonate most deeply with him about the power of seduction within innovation.

Generosity and appreciation create the optimal output performance of your heart.

***

And we’re back from our first morning session and ready for our pre-lunch immersion. The first speaker up  is Andy van Dam. He earned the second computer science degree in the world and is the Thomas J. Watson, Jr., University Professor of Technology and Education and Professor of Computer Science at Brown University. He is interested in exploring the intersection between art and computer science. His focus in this session was using the computer to access traditional artwork that would be otherwise inaccessible.

He examined the special problems of especially large artworks. With a graduate student driving he explored several large scale pieces of art including: a fresco of Egyptian art (an essential form of storytelling), the Bayeux Tapestry, and the Garibaldi Panorama (which was digitized by Brown University.) The scroll was the popular form of entertainment in its day. Measuring 4½ feet high and 273 feet long, the Garibaldi Panorama is one of the longest paintings in the world. The work depicts the life story of Italian patriot Giuseppe Garibaldi, who played a major role in the unification of Italy. The late Dr. James Walter Smith donated the relic to Brown in 2005.

In summer 2007, special funding enabled library staff and technicians from Boston Photo, a leading museum reprographics company, to fashion a makeshift photo studio in the central gallery of the Annmary Brown Memorial. They slowly and surely unrolled the panorama — six feet at a time — in order to take 91 digital photographs. The photographs will now be melded into a continuous image online. The genius of this digitization was the arrival of the Microsoft Surface operating system which had a deep zoom technology allowing an incredible level of accessibility and little instruction required to be able to view and explore the artwork.

There are two modes of access – the walk-up or the viewer mode. The walk-up mode provdes image-only view where the viewer mode introduces additional contextual information, including Ken Burns’-style image inclusion of external data and embedded video. The legibility of the artwork and the additional materials is supported by high definition capture. Additional Photoshop-like tools enable elemental image color manipulation.

The end goal is to create a platform that can be used by museums and galleries to quickly produce similar art work tours. The Tour Authoring Tool itself is like a basic asynchronous editing suite for video, which enables the addition of multiple digital assets. The tool itself is produced by the Brown Center for Digital Initiatives. They are working with the Forbidden City in Beijing on the Ching Ming Festival Scroll as well as other institutes around the world.

Display technology is going to be replaced by organic light-emitting diodes which means all surfaces around us will be interactive for display and immersion purposes. The only question is, “What won’t we be able to do?!”

***

Byron Reeves is a Professor at Stanford University; a Behavioral Scientist, Author, and proponent of Interactive Gaming & Virtual Worlds in the Workplace. He came to share his thoughts about gamification and the social implications of the impact of gaming in everyday life and social system change. Reeves is an expert on the psychological processing of media in the areas of attention, emotions, learning, and physiological responses, and has published over 100 scientific papers about media and psychology.

He noted that most people who study TV as academics profess a disdain for the medium. He, however, professed his love for it. (My wife, Jo, and Professor Reeves have this in common!) To illustrate the impact of captivation and engagement he shared a picture of himself in front of a TV and then showed the complete transformation of immersion via the game experience – in World of Warcraft. This captivation triggered the question about what else you could use this kind of captivation for?

In supporting his children at their swim meets he had a fortuitous encounter with J. Leighton Read. And Read asked, “Byron, what’s cool in your lab right now?” Which he did. He described the impact of captivation as represented by gaming. When Reeves asked Read the same question, Read described his exploration of the world of work and the chaos of not knowing how to measure what success looked like until the quarterly (or annual) review. Based on this conversation they decided to collaborate.

How might we wire-up the world of work so that it more closely represented a community-based, collaborative game environment with an epic narrative?

First they needed to address the stereotyping that pervades the conversation around games. The generation that is growing up in the world of games have integrated them into their lives. The addition of narratives and participation within the context of gaming and their integration with work have the potential to transform the business world.

The work that gaming prepares you for is complex. Learning through games, arbitrary information, becomes everyday food for thought and becomes a part of its own reward. Engagement at work is a huge issue and Reeves notes that people will make mistakes. But the amount of work in games is only going to increase. Cisco sales reps play a “Closer” game. IBM teams meeting as avatars on projects. The range of examples Reeves shared was incredibly broad and rich and all of them were supported by huge amounts of information technology.

Reeves noted the danger associated with this effort. The impact of over-engagement and OSHA implications as people develop repetitive strain injuries. Or tax laws given the location of work.

Reeves left us with the question, “What would it be like if work and play were a little more alike?”

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Mari Kurashi is the co-founder and president of Global Giving which connects individual and institutional donors directly to social, economic development, and environmental projects around the world. Mari is doing work on the social entrepreneur front to bring problems into alignment with the available range of solutions.

The questions that Mari is asked are usually framed as “Did you know…?” And her response is that she didn’t have a clue that she would have this kind of impact on the world. To help us understand her journey she recounted her childhood and high school attendance in West Germany and a day trip to see the Berlin Wall. The biggest impact was the way in which the East Germans on the other side of the Wall didn’t turn to look at the people who were looking at them. She was intrigued by this and wanted to understand how a social system could create behavior that was so counter to biological drive.

She became focused on studying and learning about the Soviet Union (primarily to avoid becoming an “O.L.” and Office Lady in Japan as her visa was in doubt.) In the middle of her Ph.D. studies the Soviet Union began to fall apart and she was dismayed by the fact that political science couldn’t predict this outcome. She went to work at the World Bank (a job that she got “on a fluke”) without any idea what the institution did and what economic development entailed. She was one of three people out of one hundred who could actually speak Russian. She was in the right place at the right time.

Her passion for wanting to reverse the regime of communism in the Soviet Union was something that Mari was focused on but her time at the World Bank came to an end – in a last chance innovation program. They created a marketplace inside the World Bank in 2000 which essentially used elements of crowdsourcing. The success of this program was hampered by the inability of the World Bank to focus o this. In this realization Mari decided to leave the World Bank to pursue this concept for addressing global poverty.

The compelling thread that runs through Mari’s narrative is the notion of personal risk. Time and time again she made huge life shifts with little understanding of what she knew or didn’t know. And by approaching her life’s work with beginner’s mind (and what she sees as incredible luck) she made her way in the world.

Mari brought her presentation back to eudaimonia and the notion of how a virtuous, life well lived fits together. She said, you must decide and practice and choose how best to fit these virtues together. Eudaimonia is a deliberate practice for integration of new options that make sense to you over time.

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A long-time BIF attendee and presenter Dennis Littky, Co-founder and Director of The Big Picture Company, began with the words, “Highschools suck.” Littky talked about how the current state of our schools and colleges impacts the least prepared the most. The poor, the disenfranchised, the economically disenfranchised suffer the most from education systems that are inflexible and immovable.

Dennis had one of the students who had participated in The Big Picture Company talked about her personal journey and the power of hands-on learning. She described her education journey interviewing people at BIF and her world travels too. A remarkable perspective on what education might become, if only we have the vision to realize that the tools we need are already at hand. Our minds must change to accommodate new ways of seeing and creating the world.

Littky shared a sobering statistic – every 12 seconds a child drops out of schools. In our time at BIF7 that was 9600 children. A criminal failure of the highest order.

Littky shared his work and his focus on fighting to transform the urban school experience as a way of combating this appalling drop-out rate. His work focuses on connecting with kids, finding out about the, finding their passions, and helping them design education experiences that meet their learning needs. Drop-outs lowered to single digits (from 46% in the Providence, RI school district0 and 100% of students who stayed went onto college. As a result the Gates Foundation sponsored a massive expansion of the program worldwide.

His recent focus was the drop-out rate at the college level. 89% of first generation college attendees drop out. His work is now focused on creating a college that uses the same model of community-based learning and engagement that has been deployed in the secondary schools program. The end result is that the first class of students is graduating this year.

Next up Littky is going to focus on adult education. What a dynamo he is.

He is looking for adult mentors; consider connecting with Dennis via Twitter if you think you have something to offer.

***
This ended my sojourn at BIF7.

Read More

Business Innovation Factory – 7 #BIF7 – Live blogging Sept 20

And we’re off! Saul Kaplan, “Anyone interested in being inspired today?”

The Business Innovation Factory 7 event in Providence, Rhode island is off and running. For the next two days I’ll be live-blogging from the center of the audience. I’m surrounded by many of the regular people who participate in and drive #innochat (certainly in North America) and I’m looking forward to learning a lot from a wonderful array of storytellers who are scheduled to share.

***

 

John Werner, Chief Mobilization Officer & Managing Director of Citizen Schools is sharing his story first off. The power of citizen involvement in large-scale engagement transformation.

Since 1970 the USA has doubled the amount spent on education. The USA still has the largest economy in the world but we have a dropping college graduation rate and far less focus on the value of education. The education debate in the USA is like a field of sqwaking birds while other nations are taking flight and flying out of view in “V” formation.

Citizen Schools is expanding the learning day and adding about 1000 hours to the school year. Rather than increasing the number of hours that teachers work they are reaching out to the community to have citizens teach in middle school classrooms. IN one case a citizen teacher with his graduate school students is teaching how to program in scratch, the language for Lego mindstorms. The Mayor of Boston also participates in the Citizen School program with students providing input on city planning as apprentices. There are currently 1000 apprentices and the drive is to reach 2000 apprentices in the next 2 years.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A strong focus in Citizen Schools is on STEM – (Science Technology Energy Math) which are a foundation for many of the careers of the future. Seeds of innovation. This program focus lends itself to self-directed learning.

Shawn, one of the students that was a part of the Citizen School program took the stage to share a very personal story about his inability to act on behalf of another in distress and implored us, “If you see something, say something”;  do something more than what we think we could or should do.

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Graham Milner is next up on the BIF7 stage, a man who bleeds WD-40. Graham is the Executive Vice President, Global Development and Chief Branding Officer of the WD-40 company. He shared the story of the creation of water displacement formula #1 and #2 and so on. It only took forty tries to make, yes, WD-40 . The company is a $350M company that is 50 years old and offers only a single product. The product was created for General Dynamics out of a need to address product moisture issues.

The brand is built on the back of thieves (General Dynamics employees were stealing WD-40 in their lunch pails) and natural disasters (through a massive company response to a hurricane.)

You ought not have the people in charge of tomorrow in charge of today because the urgent will always beat out the important. – Graham Milner (vai Walmart CEO)

Graham shared the story of the genesis of the “smart straw” which was born from a need to create a better way to spray WD-40. Born from pain and effort and the response was, “It’s about time.”

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Professional photographer Eva Timothy, said, the magic is not in the black box, the magic is the way we see the world. She grew up in Soviet Bulgaria and talked about the inspiration of her grandfather refusing to write for the propagandists who died for his beliefs and his freedom to choose. Her father painted a Beatles mural on the family’s kitchen wall for which he (and they) could have gone to jail.

Timothy showed one of her photos of the US Capitol Building shot from the Library of Congress and says this represented the notion of looking ahead, emblematic of her journey to the USA. Her photo of a mosaic tile reading, “Knowledge is Power,” was seen as a reflection of the need to learn. In her own life she passionately learned English. “There is a moment in life when you are learning and you can’t stop.” English opened up so many opportunities for her.

She arrived in the USA in 1994 – the same year Old Navy was founded – how’s that for a touchstone!? But such a remarkable tribute to her tenacity and spirited pursuit of her dream to come to America.

In her work today Timothy sees history as a window to the future. Her photography focuses on the age of discovery using lenses to reframe the historical perspective in ways that are revealing. Columbus, Da Vinci, Newton and Galileo all offer perspectives for our future. She cited Galileo Galilee as opening the universe to us by his question, “What else might I see?” Her photo captures this inquiry by showing Galileo juxtaposed with his own sketch of the Moon. See her show at www.lostinlearning.

We have so much opportunity to learn today and to take the stories of those who came before to inspire us.

***

And the last speaker of the early morning session is Jim Mellado, President of The Willow Creek Association which is dedicated to providing leadership staff and volunteers to local church organizations. He talked about his pursuit of becoming an Olympic athlete but found that the church kept calling him. He journeyed to South Korea to witness the world’s largest church with 500,000 congregants. On Sunday this church holds seven back-to-back services from sun up to sun down. The church is considered one of the fundamental contributors to South Korea’s economic and social success.

With his passion, Mellado sees that churches should be a vast source of contribution to society. Not detractors. His vision has been fed by multiple sources, including his reading of a Drucker article on what business can learn from the non-profit sector. The article highlighted the Willow Creek Association and the models and distinctive practices that differentiated it. He became the President of the leadership development program. Early on the Willow Creek Association represented over 50 different denominations, not wanting to change and give up their faith but wanting to learn from each other. Mellado became a student of innovation and a student of the members of his association. From that learning he determined how he could grow the adoption rate of his leadership model. Today there are over 90 denominations who are early adopters of the WCA models. Their theme is always, “Leaed Where You Are.”

The key learning was convincing early adopter churches not to leave their denominational systems because their actions were considered disruptive. WCA said, “don’t leave, we’ll feed you to ensure your success.” And overtime the WCA leadership events grew over time. Today they are simulcast in 280 cities all around the world to reach places that would never see some of these key note speakers, like Gary Hamel, Bill Clinton, Bono, etc.

He spoke passionately about helping others see the power they have themselves to connect, inspire and transform. A fitting way to kick us into the first break of the day.

***

Second session and we’re back with Alex Jadad a “dynamo in the health care space,” according to Saul Kaplan, Founder and Chief Catalyst of BIF.

Dr. Alex Jadad, Chief Innovator and Founder, Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, shared the life of his favorite superhero as he was growing up in Colombia, his grandfather Ricardo, who was a surgeon. He described his father being air-dropped into remote villages to provide care to women giving birth. His grandfather’s inspiration was to admonish his grandson to be better than him. And in searching for that he ‘discovered’ Dr. “Bones” McCoy from Star Trek fame – “the first to demonstrate to me a wireless network.”

Upon qualifying for medical school his grandfather shared with him some wisdom passed down from professor to professor, “Remember, remember, remember: your mission is to cure sometimes, alleviate often and console always.” And when he graduated he realized that his grandfather could no longer operate as a surgeon as his shoulder was frozen and he had high blood pressure, shortly thereafter his grandfather recognized a tremor, which was the arrival of Parkinson’s disease. Dr. Jadad, for all his searching, could not cure his grandfather’s illness and in doing so forgot to offer consolation. His research on knowledge systems and the use of technology to create diagnostic systems could not deliver what he so much wanted to.

“When you reach 60 if you’re not feeling well, if you’re suffering, shoot yourself!,” were Ricardo’s last spoken words before he received a tracheotomy so that he could eat and breath. And this left Alex if a whole universe of “if only?” questions which led him to end of life care.

If only. Those must be the two saddest words in the world.

-       Mercedes Lackey

He then shared with us his work in with The Maimonides Project which is dedicated to imagining and creating new and better approaches to health and wellness, together, worldwide. In 2008 Dr. Jadad urged the British Medical Journal to seek a new definition for health from around the world. This kicked off a search for a new meaning for health, one that focuses on suffering, its eradication, mitigation, and use (when it cannot be removed) for meaning-making. And they arrived at the following questions:

What makes you happiest? What is your verb? How could you spend as much time doing it, with no regrets? How could your ensure that everyone else can do the same?

Could we build a Noosphere? Piere Teilhard de Chardin.

***

The delightful Angela Blanchard, President & CEO, Neighborhood Centers, Inc., a Texan and a Cajun  shared her passion about creating thriving neighborhoods and communities. She recounted her family’s approach to combating poverty, working hard and giving it all away.

She asked, “What comes to mind when you think of a poor neighborhood?” We give poor neighborhoods new names every now and then, like “blight.” Ms. Blanchard notes that poor neighborhoods are defined by their: lacks, gaps, needs, wants, broken stuff…We catalog the problems only. We seek what is not working. It doesn’t work because you can’t build on broken. The change begins with the first new question.

In recounting a neighborhood in Houston, the new Ellis Island in that it drew populations from all over the world, she described people packing themselves to the USA bringing with them their aspirations, hopes and dreams. All anyone else saw was what was broken and not working. She started with:

  • What’s working?
  • What strong?
  • What’s right?

All of which led to what was working and right and the source of community strength. And with Neighborhood Centers, Blanchard began to rigorously capture what was working with the same focus that others had cataloged the things that were not working. She found that her new story about this community was falling on deaf ears. The first person that she reached wanted help and said that, “I’ve been waiting for you.” And then Hurricane Katrina happened.

Katrina meant 125,000 people flooded into Houston from New Orleans and the Mayor of Houston said, “Just do what you do.’ So they did. They listened to stories of enormous loss who carried with them the few possessions that they could rescue. And then they asked questions about what people had. “Tell us about your strengths. Tell us about your connections. Tell us about what you can do.” This reframing of questions meant that people could now think about a path forward. Blanchard notes that this is not a Pollyanna approach, it meets the needs of communities in distress everywhere. It should be noted that the work of David Cooperrider at Case Western Reserve University on Appreciative Inquiry is reflected in Neighborhood Centers approach.

We are the only species in the world that creates the future out of our own imagination. Blanchard invited us to be a part of a new story.

***

The President of Babson College, Len Schlesinger, who came to present the collaborated on the research project between BIF and Babson focused on the new definitions of entrepreneurship. Babson is a leader in the entrepreneurship space (leading the undergraduate domain for 15 years and the graduate domain for 8 years.)

Visit: www.businessinnovationfactory.com/elab

Via Hugh Macleod, but originally Jerry Garcia, “Don’t try to be the best you do, be the only.” And this drives Babson with its 2000 undergraduates on campus each year, and it’s ever-growing network and encouragement of entrepreneurship around the world. They desire to have a profound impact on the world by redefining the meaning of entrepreneurship. They do this by…

Articulating, Diffusing, and Proving the method of Entrepreneurship.

Babson is in the business of creating a deeper understanding of the experience of entrepreneurship so that they can spread it as far as possible. Schlesinger highlighted the impacted the leaders of organization development theory and behavior like Henry Mintzberg. The gap between current practice of management and entrepreneurship has been assessed by studying 250 entrepreneurs and their patterns of behavior. The work with BIF was designed to start new conversations and to create programs to support innovation and entrepreneurship everywhere. The range of programs being defined and support is quite remarkable.

Failure is intentional iteration and easier to sell when framed in that manner.

Entrepreneurship is a life skill which needs to be learned by more and more.

Online communities are places for profound connection.

Entrepreneurship is not a word that should be reserved for business owners – a shocking devaluation of the word.

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

A mentor to Saul Kaplan, Richard Saul Wurman is coming to talk about his new conference – WWW.WWW

Richard Saul Wurman rearranged the set to by illustrated fashion arrive at our need to tell the truth. “We ‘Uh-Hah’ each other to death.” Agreeing where we don’t have a clue. (With a side detour into the nature of human ears.)

“I’m unemployable as I don’t have skill sets. Which means I’m both terrified and confident at the same time.” The desire for comfort brings you down. Don’t try to live comfortably.

Wurman has published about 80 books and he did this by publishing things on subjects that he doesn’t understand. This intellectual curiosity feeds his productivity. This was the genesis of TED and the landmark conferences he created.

His new conference is a gathering without presentations nor a schedule nor PowerPoint nor tickets. He has invited the 100 most extraordinary people he knows and pair them up to have conversations with each other. Without introductions he will pose a premise and they will then talk to each other. When the conversation gets boring, he’ll pull them off stage. It is, intellectual jazz. Throughout which there will be a musical thread directed by YoYo Ma and Herbie Hancock.

This conference is dedicated to pattern recognition. The range of space Wurman talks of creating for conversation is wonderful – it affords room for truth, to capture and share a moment of truth about ourselves with each other. Wurman recommended that we seek out Geoffrey West, the former head of the Santa Fe Institute, to indicate the caliber of the people who are participating.

He also highlighted his next conference will be on prophecy. 25 people will be invited to share a prophecy which they believe and may be able to substantiate. Wurman continues to push and shake the status quo. Witty, profane and intriguing all at once.

***

Angus Davis has been an entrepreneur for years (since he was 18) He currently working on Swipely.

The relationship with the fear of failure is what differentiates entrepreneurs. Davis went from wanting a Stepford life to one modeled after Ferris Bueler. His after school job was building websites and this was the stabilizing force in his life. It was all he really cared about. Through this he was drawn to Netscape who offered him a Summer internship. Which was unusual, until that time they had only had Engineering and MBA internships. He sought out Mike McHugh, the VP of Technology, who asked why are you going to college, “come and work for us.” So he did.

When he started TellMe Networks with McHugh that was when he truly found out what it meant to be an entrepreneur. He found he had to manage his fear of failure. A perceived cost of failure increases over time. And…we have our first unicorn sighting! Complete with rainbow. No product, no business model, no problem.

Staggering from failure to failure. “We laid people off. We failed at that and had to have another round of lay-offs. We failed at failure.”

Great mention of the NYTimes magazine cover story on failure. “What if the Secret to Success is Failure?” All entrepreneurs are married to success but have ongoing affairs with failure. He cited a TED Talk by the author of “Eat Pray Love”,

It is exceedingly likely that my greatest success is behind me.

- Elizabeth Gilbert

Davis left us with the following: Let’s make better mistakes tomorrow – good advice for all.

***

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rebecca Onie, co-founded and his the Chief Executive Officer of Health Leads (formerly Project HEALTH) with Dr. Barry Zuckerman, Chair of Pediatrics at Boston Medical Center. Her work is focused on transforming healthcare opportunities by deploying a trained and mobilized corps of 660 college volunteers serving nearly 6,000 low-income patients and their families in Baltimore, Boston, Chicago, New York, Providence, and Washington, D.C.

The profound health concerns of these low income people are rooted in the absences of basic rights of life, such as access to food and shelter, and many healthcare providers were practicing a, “Don’t ask. Don’t tell,” policy in response. They simply didn’t know what to do. Health Leads model of intervention is based on a similar model espoused by a doctor in the Mississippi Delta in the 1960’s, Jack Geiger.

Rebecca noted that so many factors need to be aligned. She boiled them down to three areas of focus for Health Leads:

  1. Amateurs talk about strategy. Professionals talk about logistics. – General Omar M. Bradley
  2. Health Leads connects social resources with mostly healthy patients, which falls completely outside the current healthcare model. Does this mean that they fall outside the conversation?
  3. Don’t become the problem we are trying to transform.

Every victory between here and there is so much more significant when the stakes are so high – the transformation of healthcare. Health Leads success is to transform healthcare delivery, how do we innovate and make sure that actually happens.

***

A social research scientist and Principal Research Scientist at Yahoo!, Duncan Watts shared his research. Starting out as a Physicist, he switched to Engineering and Math before becoming a Sociologist and finally went to work at Yahoo!

Watts highlighted a book written by a social scientist and reviewed by physicist in which the physicist disparaged the domain of social science essentially saying that physicists could solve all these problems “in a trice.” Obviously, the complexity of the systems at play were beyond the reviewer. As Watts explained, social systems are incredibly complex but don’t appear to be complex. He highlighted how crazy it was for former Senator Bill Frist to say, “It’s not rocket science,” when discussing fixing healthcare.

The challenge is to reflect on what we think is obvious – the concept of obviousness is a deep problem because it distracts us from seeing the data right in front of us. Common sense is more of an impediment to innovation and creativity than you would think. Our problem is when we miss-apply common sense to problems that are not concrete, everyday situations. Complex systems are not fit places for common sense to be applied.

Stories are powerful, but that power helps us generalize about the past to make predictions about the future which often leads us into trouble. This works for repeatable situations. But for complex system, history never repeats itself, it is always rife with unintended consequences.

To address this:

  • Augment common sense with experimentation
  • Policy, strategy and marketing could benefit from a more systematic approach
  • Social sciences data constraints which meant problems were intractable can be addressed through data mining available on multiple social media platforms like – Twitter, Mechanical Turk at Amazon.

Watts is the author of Everything is Obvious* (*Once you know the answer)

Complex systems are not fit places for common sense to be applied. – Duncan Watts

***

Sebastian Ruth, the violinist shared music that inspires him and the ways in which music can reach into people to challenge them to reveal meaningful and personal truths. He asked:

  • Can music make us feel something truly new?
  • Can that feeling grow in such a way that it changes us?

Ruth explored his influences, people who inspire him, and then had two of his students perform a duet for us, Heather and Alanna, who are a part of the Community Music Works program. They played Summer Solstice Song by Bela Bartok.

***

Author, Co-chairman, Deloitte Center for The Edge, John Hagel took the lead after the last break of Day 1. He worked with John Seely Brown and is often featured at the HBR Online blog site. He decided to explore some of the distinctions between stories.

He illustrated his views based on three personal stories. He setup the internet practice at McKinsey in the early 1990’s and when he asked other partners if he could speak to their clients about the internet they said, politely, “No.” So instead of pushing his way into clients he wrote a book instead called, Net Gain, which had an interesting effect in that it was widely shared and the McKinsey phones started to ring and clients pulled partners into a dialog about the internet. From a dead start the internet practice became a $500M practice in 5 years.

Hagel’s second story related his childhood obsession with dragging his family out to large construction sites to sit on the huge equipment and imagine what he might build. And then twenty years ago he had the same kind of “builder’s fascination” with the potential for what might be accomplished with the internet. He became increasingly excited by what people could do with the platforms that the internet provided. With the internet Hagel found he could overcome his childhood shyness by developing relationships and community online that evolved into real life community.

The third story Hagel shared was about the United States. He spoke of the risks that people faced and experienced in order to come to the USA to create a new life. He noted how exciting it was that the USA attracts this whole group of people who are predisposed to creating, innovating, exploring, and learning the new. All of which drives the USA today.

Each story Hagel shared represents the difference between a story and a narrative. Stories have a beginning, a middle, and an end. Narratives have no end, they are continuously unfolding. The McKinsey story is a true story. The second story was a personal narrative about what excites Hagel to contribute. The third story is a national narrative and they are powerful for inviting participation.

In uncertain times we have more degrees of freedom to change our future and that is exactly when we become most risk averse.

Both the Republicans and the Democrats have gone to a threat-based narrative. Both of which ask us to focus on risk and threat aversion. Hagel proposes a more opportunity-focused narrative (back to Coopperrider’s work – see above.)

***

Dale Stephens created Uncollege and earned won Theil Fellowships, offering $100,000 to entrepreneurs to drop out of college and pursue their dreams. Essentially he is applying the spirit and practice of homeschooling to higher education. Self-directed, low-cost, participatory, collaborative, and steeped in design thinking.

We’re mortgaging away our freedom to innovate to college debt.

Stehpens noted, “I’m passionate about education but I dropped out of college because the opportunity cost was too high.”

He hacked his education, worked on campaigns, went to France, built businesses all of which he fashioned into his own education experience. He never doubted he would go to college, but found that the idealism he sought was lacking or miss-applied to partying. He found a like minded peer who, also homeschooled, helped him realize that their inability to fit within the college framework was not their problem but lay in a profoundly broken system.

What happens in class stays in class – every day in higher education is like a trip to Vegas.

College is not preparing its graduates for success. Professors are researching. Students are partying. The Development Office is soliciting funds. The Administration is building new facilities to attract more money. – The whole system is broken and is struggling under the weight of misaligned expectations.

Stephens notes that college should be about finding work that you love, that is meaningful to you. The struggle is that college is not aligned to that expectation at all. He quoted Mark Twain: “I never let me schooling interfere with my education.”

Life is a field trip and we don’t need a permission slip.

How much of what you know and what you use came from university, versus from experience. And how many of those experiences did you forgo in pursuit of a degree.

***

Next up was Fred Mandell, a life change artist. He began with a story of August Renoir who suffered from rheumatoid arthritis. Who painted every day into late 80’s assisted by his family. He died after spending the day painting. As he finished he said to his son, “I think I’m beginning to understand something about it.” Mandell asked, do we know what “it” is? This quest shapes our life to our last day and it shaped and formed by a set of poor skills with which we struggle to understand our “it.”

Having been a refugee from the financial services sector, he had discovered how to become a “corporate athlete”, what design firm IDEO would essentially call a “T-shaped person” who was tasked with being an intrapreneur. In his early 50’s Mandell was experiencing a roiling sensation inside him. So, he decided to enroll in a sculpture workshop. Over time he became a sculptor, including holding a one person show. In 2001 he moved away from the corporate role to pursue his art more seriously.

From here he, “entered a period of strange discomfort.” He didn’t know how to explain himself in terms of what he did and persisted in explaining himself in terms of what he was. This triggered a search for what energized him. He discovered his personal mantra: “create, integrate, and make a difference.” This is what he says, “torches my soul.”

When he creates he is both lost and found. He believes he is at his highest and best self when he his making a difference in the lives of others. Mandell also searches for what makes geniuses great. With a co-author, Kathy Jordan, he found those elements that help artists create for extended period of time. This research yielded an interesting view into the narrative arch of artists.

Life change is a fundamentally create process. The core creative skills are, in fact, life skills. Without them people struggle to navigate change in their lives.

The parallels between creating an organization and creating a body of work were remarkable. This became the genesis of a program called the “Innovation Studio.”

Picasso said, “We begin with an idea and it becomes something else.” A mindset that we can apply to our lives.

***

Matthew Moniz is one of the youngest alpinists. He has been climbing since he can remember. He shared the story of his best friend with pulmonary hyper-tension (PH), Iain Hess, and how he found out learned more about his friend’s disease. He said that climbing gives him a way to experience that kind of feeling.

He shared his affinity for learning about the Himalayas through the porters who loved their lives in the mountains. During this time he met a Korean reporter who gave Matt the idea that he could use his age and his passion as a way to inspire others to work in the field of PH. Matt noted that he chooses to do high-altitude mountaineering while his friend Iain experiences the equivalent feelings 24×7; which gives him a better understanding of what his friend is going through.

Matt gave us a travelogue of his mountain adventures. He seems to have lived more in his short life than many in world. His spirit and youthful passion for his sport are an inspirational.

But wait there’s more! Matt then decided to do 14 14’s (14,000 foot mountains) in 14 days as a way of honoring Iain’s struggle. And in doing this people with PH found a way that they could explain their disease to others. In doing so they raised $25,000 for the Iain Hess Breath Easy Fund.

And yet another decision was to do the 50 highest peaks in each of the 50 states in 50 days. With so many different environments the terrain was wildly divergent. As a result he was names one of the adventurers of the year by National Geographic in 2010. Matt Moniz is an inspiration…and a machine.

See more of Matt’s journeys here.

***

What a day! A huge round of applause goes out to the storytellers and the great folks at the Business Innovation Factory for their phenomenal effort. Looking forward to Day 2 tomorrow. Below is the Shepard Fairy OBEY mural in downtown Providence, RI. A great piece of art in a great town.

Read More

Great post on the power of Priming at FastCompany

Here at Primed Associates we are always looking for others’ takes on the concept of priming. This week we share a great post from the FastCompany site by Martin Lindstrom, who has a new book out, Brandwashed: Tricks Companies Use to Manipulate Our Minds and Persuade Us to Buy

Here is Lindstrom’s opening about the power of priming in order to increase the likelihood of a desired outcome…

Have you ever been primed? I mean has anyone ever deliberately influenced your subconscious mind and altered your perception of reality without your knowing it? Whole Foods Market, and others, are doing it to you right now.

Derren Brown, a British illusionist famous for his mind-reading act, set out to prove just how susceptible we are to the many thousands of signals we’re exposed to each day. Read more here.

Read More

Podcast Interview at Inmagic: Lessons learned from Steve Jobs

3 qualities of innovative companies: Lessons learned from Steve Jobs

A couple of weeks ago I was interviewed by the good people who run the podcast for Inmagic (Janelle Kozyra, the host, & Hannah Messenger, the producer).  We had an interesting discussion about the differences of innovation between B2C and B2B enterprises. Which eventually led to Steve Jobs, as all things had that week…

When Steve Jobs resigned as Apple’s CEO last week, it seemed he was taking with him everything that makes Apple the innovative powerhouse that it is today. Or did he? Apple is arguably the #1 poster child for innovation. But was it all a result of Steve Jobs’ genius, or rather the culture of innovation he’s developed over time?

Head over to listen to the full podcast (about 30 mins) and see a full transcript.

Read More

Innovating Event Participation through Social Media: expanding the impact of SXSW, World Innovation Forum & more

Over the last two years I have had the good fortune to be drawn into the world of live-blogging at events. I came into this as a result of trying to figure out how to maximize the value I was gaining from using Twitter. To be perfectly honest, when I first saw Twitter and the kinds of messages people were posting, I thought: “Great. Another platform for the terminally self-involved and ego-centric to shout, ‘Look at me!’” But after exploring it some more, and heeding the advice of folks like Chris Brogan, who advocated the use of Twitter as a tool for keeping connected with subjects that were of interest and importance to you, I found my way to #innochat.

For those of you who don’t know, #innochat is a weekly Twitter chat held at noon (USA Eastern Standard/Daylight Time) every Thursday. Each week a topic is determined, a framing post is created in support of the topic with links to appropriate resources, and some key questions are identified to prompt and guide discussion. Usually the person who identified the topic also writes the framing post and moderates the chat on that day. Between 50 to 150 people “show up” to wrestle with a core concept each week. In the space of an hour we may have nearly 1,000 tweets. In short, it is a great online event which rarely disappoints in terms of engagement, energy, and enthusiasm.

What does this have to do with event participation? Good question.

This chat model is an adjunct to a wider series of Twitter chat and live event integrations which are expanding the impact and engagement of those events beyond participants in a room. One recent example is covered very well by Angela Dunn (aka @blogbrevity) who wrote a series of great posts at Pharmaphorum on “How to make your conference social”. Angela’s most recent post focuses on the establishment of a bloggers’ hub and how to effectively participate in an event as a blogger. You might even see someone you know being interviewed.

Angela Dunn interview with Renee Hopkins & Drew Marshall

The great thing about Angela’s advice is that it is practical and useful no matter what type of event you run. This is drawn directly from her own experience as a blogger at multiple events and this post specifically focuses on the great work of George Levy, VP of Online Marketing for HSM Americas, who created the Blogger’s Hub at the HSM World Innovation Forum three years ago. From a full-blown, multiday conference to a focused internal event for innovators in your organization, integrating social media expands the scope of the conversation and broadens its utility to a much wider audience. The key is to be clear about your objectives for participants both in the room and further afield.

As part of my volunteer work helping to coordinate #innochat sessions, which I fell into, I have also been asked to participate as a live blogger for internal company events. Francois Gossieux, founder of Human 1.0, invited me to participate in one such event for a technology innovation company that incorporated a range of bloggers, the host company, and client participants in the room. By engaging bloggers, the company created a much wider platform for its small event, inviting participation from around the world to share in the experience being generated in a hotel conference room in Orlando, Florida. This event leveraged social media in a way that meant the host company had a broader reach and greater impact than a typical trade show event or internal product launch would ever have had.

Another off-shoot from my #innochat experience was taking the online chat to a live setting at the South By South West Interactive Festival (aka. SXSW) this year. Renee Hopkins, one of the long-time contributors to and hosts of #innochat invited me, Gwen Ishmael, and Jason Sutton to participate in a Core Conversation at SXSW on Business 101—focused on making money as a small enterprise or solo entrepreneur. Now, the way Core Conversations had been designed by the SXSW organizers was to have them be audio-visual-free zones: The rooms were set up in the round (all the chairs facing each other in a large circle) with no AV equipment. Being the innovators we are, the #innochat team on the ground immediately subverted that.

We set up a projector and omni-directional microphone in order to live-stream the conversation in the room. We also had Gwen and Justin cover the #innochat hashtag live while Renee and I integrated comments from inside the room with questions, comments, and suggestions from the wider #innochat community. Our experience at SXSW had been that if audience members were dissatisfied with their in-room experience, they would quite rapidly employ the rule of “two feet” in that they could walk out at any stage. We started with a packed room (over 100 people) and we ended up with people sitting on the floor around the room by the time we finished. The dynamic between the room participants and those following and engaging with the chat stream at #innochat was great.

As people left, some said it was the most engaging session they had been to so far.

How are you maximizing the use of social media to increase the impact of your efforts?

Read More

Innovation Schadenfreude: creating value from the misery of others

The unspoken goal of innovation is to delight. In their delight, the user or recipient of the innovation validates the efforts made on their behalf to dispel their problem. For an innovator the joy comes from recognizing pain, suffering, heartache, or confusion and then conceiving of and designing something that takes that misery away.

If necessity is the mother of invention, then necessity can be one mean mommy, because innovation requires a challenge to address, and by its very nature, innovation has misery at its root.

To feel envy is human, to savor schadenfreude is devilish.

-       Arthur Schopenhauer

Recently there was a slideshow post at the Huffington Post about the top consumer complaints to the FTC (the Federal Trade Commission, a United States regulatory body ). Over the course of 2010, the FTC received a total of 1,339,265 complaints filed. That’s a whole lot of unhappiness. When I first read this list, given my background in customer service and technical support environments, I was not surprised. It included such complaints as credit card charges, prizes, sweepstakes and lotteries, and identity theft (No. 1 by an 8 percent margin).

As I considered the list, I began to think of this as a great opportunity for innovation. Any one of these areas could be a huge goldmine for the willing innovator.

 

Something grim this ways comes

It is only through labor and painful effort, by grim energy and resolute courage, that we move on to better things.

-       Theodore Roosevelt

What about the industries with the highest number of customer complaints? Well, let’s go to the data. At the top of the list are cellular telephone vendors, equipment manufacturers, and network providers. Given the ubiquity of these highly complex devices, seeing this industry at the top of the list is not surprising. What is more interesting is the fact that banks are near the top of this industry survey, too—ahead of collection agencies and used car dealers. The increasing complexity of available services for consumer banking combined with a less-than-transparent approach to fee implementation might make this an area ripe for transformation.

But the most compelling data from an innovation opportunity perspective is not which industries reside at the top of the list.  The greatest opportunities lie in those industries with the widest margin between customer complaints and the percentage of complaints that are resolved. That is the place of greatest pain. That is also the place where there might be rich human experience that could feed innovative solutions.

The banks’ attempts to resolve the customer issues see them at the peak. By addressing 100 percent of the complaints within 30 days, they’re not leaving much room for customer attrition. While the cellular phone companies have the most complaints, they are also doing a fairly decent job of addressing customers’ needs in a timely fashion. It’s those companies who deliver large physical products (cars, used cars, furniture) who seem to be failing to resolve customer issues quickly enough. Based on my customer service experience, I see a significant opportunity in this space to convert customers through service and support innovation.

Make the pain go away. Make a customer for life.

The enduring unhappiness of the unfulfilled need

What people need and what they want may be very different.

-       Elbert Hubbard

Clayton Christensen described the inherent need behind any successful innovation was a particular “job-to-be-done” by a customer. Here is an article in MIT Sloan Management magazine that highlights the theory behind the approach. The job-to-be-done theory holds that products and services are most successful when they connect a circumstance with a job that customers need to get done. By identifying those jobs people really care about and developing products and services that make it easier to achieve these jobs, companies can identify new markets that they were previously unaware of or that could not be uncovered by traditional market segmentation. The key ”a-ha” is that jobs-to-be-done are actually an indicator of customer pain and frustration.

When you look at the number of complaints in the segments above, you can choose to see a whole world of hurt. An innovator will see something different: They choose to see a realm of possibility.

Complaints arise from an unmet need, which often may be simply resolved, except the customer doesn’t know how to access the solution. Sometimes those needs may be quite complex, revealing a gap in functionality or utility that should be closed. Regardless, each and every complaint represents a unique opportunity to fulfill a job-to-be-done. If these needs remain unfulfilled, not only is the innovation opportunity lost, but the unhappiness will extend to the vendor of the product or service as they lose a customer.

In this light an unfulfilled need is a contagion spreading from customer to customer, and from customer to vendor, the result being a flight to the next possible alternative.

 

WTF? vs. “Can you hear me now?”

Art is not only about angst.

-       John Corigliano

Those enterprises that seek to exploit the deficiencies in their market segment often make significant strides against their competitors. Take Verizon Wireless. (Full disclosure: the parent company, Verizon, is a client.) One of the greatest complaints about mobile or cellular telephones is the poor service reception and the inability to hear calls. J.D. Power and Associates conducts a semiannual study measuring wireless call quality based on seven problem areas that impact overall carrier performance: dropped calls; static/interference; failed call connection on the first try; voice distortion; echoes; no immediate voicemail notification; and no immediate text message notification. Verizon Wireless saw that improvements in these seven areas would yield a significant return on investment, and so they began innovating to directly address these issues.

The result? Verizon Wireless began leading the way in call quality improvement, which gave rise to their decade-long advertising campaign with the enduring tag line, “Can you hear me now?” (The campaign was only retired in September 2010.) Perhaps a more compelling reason than age for the end of the campaign is that shifts in wireless phone usage, including smartphone and texting use, as well as an increase in the percentage of wireless calls being made and received inside buildings, has led to a halt in overall call quality improvement. This already has Verizon Wireless’s eye focused on a new complaint: the limitations of mobile bandwidth. Can you say, “Hello, 4G!”?

Whatever complaints your customers have, don’t disregard them. Take them for the gift they truly are. Because there’s opportunity in their misery, provided you choose to do something about it, and soon.

This post was originally featured here:

Read More

Motivated to innovate: How an organization’s culture can cultivate or crush

While motivation is essentially a self-generated state, the organizational culture of a group or individual dedicated to the pursuit of innovation greatly influences their performance. That culture both dominates and mediates, and if it is not positively addressed, competing motivations and needs can come into play. As has been mentioned previously more than once in the Think Primed Blog, innovation requires the introduction of change into inherently stable systems. Because of this, an organizational culture plays a large role in fostering and sustaining motivation.

Everybody needs beauty as well as bread, places to play in and pray in where nature may heal and cheer and give strength to the body and soul.

-       John Muir

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Maslow%27s_Hierarchy_of_Needs.svg

 

To meet those competing needs, an organization must address powerful personal motivators. One of the best models highlighting what’s at stake during this kind of effort is Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs.

So much of organization life takes place at the bottom of this pyramid; the equivalent of “keeping the lights on and the water running.” Which is a great model for an Industrial Age company intent on making an endless succession of the same widgets in a production line. Not many of those companies thriving today, are there?

A step up from physiological needs are the types of organizations that pitch benefits packages addressing the safety and security concerns of their members and, to a certain extent, some esteem needs. Organizations with strong and stable cultures often reinforce the needs associated with love and belonging, yet they have all the fun and dysfunction of families. They’re mostly built for comfort rather than speed, required to respond to changing and dynamic market forces.

The most dynamic and innovative companies seek to work at the highest levels of this model, to get the best from people every day.

 

Price of admission

It’s not enough for an organization culture to provide the equivalent of shelter in a storm, especially not if that same organization wants its members to invest themselves in the success of the enterprise. Prior to the Great Unpleasantness (aka the Great Recession), companies were scrambling to create environments that attracted the best and the brightest. Though many companies today remain focused on that, the majority merely pays it lip service or don’t pursue that practice at all.

These latter companies are minding their reserves and hoarding their resources. This is practice won’t yield significant results at all.

The price of admission to those seeking to create innovation-capable cultures is the same as it has always been: collaborative cultures where people feel safe to share their ideas, where they feel like they can find a “home,” where they are recognized for their contribution, and were they feel they can be their best selves. Charlie Gilkey, author of the Productive Flourishing blog, recently noted that it took him several quarters to come up with his list for a post titled “What I Believe.” The end result is something that reflects what most of us are looking for in our lives. Work is where people spend most of their waking hours, so organization better figure out how to create the conditions for a culture that supports those beliefs he mentions.

One such example of the fulfilling organization, a company dedicated to the principals of loose/tight leadership (small set rules, tightly managed), is the online video powerhouse Hulu. Recently Fast Company magazine ran a great profile online of Hulu’s organization culture, which showed how power is distributed to the lowest organization level possible for effective decision-making and execution. Engagement is driven by the establishment of a small set of performance-based rules that are tightly enforced, while most aspects of organization life are left to the individual or group to design, organize, implement, and process. The net result is an organization that makes people want to deliver their best effort.

We all want to belong

This kind of democratically-biased culture creates a cohesion that is rare in many larger organizations. Usually when start-ups cross the growth chasm (as distinct from the adoption chasm defined in Geoffrey Moore’s book Crossing the Chasm), the transition in revenues or size (over $10 million and over 150 people, respectively) means their flexibility collapses under command-and-control patterns and poorly defined and managed performance expectations. That hasn’t happened at Hulu. They are large, growing larger, and thriving by deferring to their community members.

Organizations that fail to cross the growth chasm come up hard against the reality of being inhospitable. They cease to grow and flourish, because they don’t make room for the strength that others may provide by applying their own unique and divergent talents. The start-up company that fails to grow is usually completely tied to one person’s hierarchy of needs: the founder. The founder is usually on a never-ending treadmill of addressing their most elemental needs for safety.

In Hulu’s case, ownership of issues, problem-solving, and performance management is baked into the culture of this company. Everyone has an opportunity to accept responsibility and accountability for outcomes. Rather than struggling with lines of authority, each person is supported in discovering how they may best contribute collaboratively to the overarching corporate success. This cohesive sense of belonging serves as a path for higher levels of self-actualization, each of which offers material benefit in attaining organization strategy.

 

To be held in high esteem

The path through successive levels of Maslow’s Hierarchy is not necessarily straight, but the value to the company of performing at each successive level is nearly always positive. Provided that each level offers some opportunity for consolidation of the needs met, and that the striving continues upward, value generation will be significant. Given a place to call “home” and the recognition that they do have a place to contribute, many employees capitalize by fostering esteem among their peers.

That focus informs value by playing to the individual’s strengths so that they may be successful and have increasing impact over time. The respect of peers for contributions, whether directly from innovation or as a result of building on an existing practice or procedure, by turn fosters self-respect. This leads to a positive environmental feedback loop—each success creates the opportunity for greater successes over time.

A better you/me/us through self-actualization

At the pinnacle of Maslow’s Hierarchy is the concept of self-actualization. The term originated in a work by Kurt Goldstein called The Organism: A Holistic Approach to Biology Derived from Pathological Data in Man (commence head-spinning now). While Goldstein used the term to describe a state all humans strove to achieve, Maslow used the term self-actualization to describe a desire, not a driving force, that could lead to the realization of one’s capabilities. For Maslow, self-actualization did not determine one’s life; rather, it gave the individual a motivation to achieve personal ambitions and fulfillment.

Taken as a level of development to meet specific personal needs, self-actualization is completely in alignment with effective innovation. Those people who are operating to become more self-actualized are more likely to embrace reality and facts rather than deny truth. This leads to more rational understanding of the root causes of circumstances and a drive towards focusing on problems outside themselves.

When it comes to an understanding of the human-centricity required for effective innovation — the notion that an innovation must have a specific utility in mind — those who firmly address their need to self-actualize accept their own human nature with all its shortcomings, and similarly accept the nature of others with a general lack prejudice. This breeds resilience and a spontaneity that are great innovation traits.

Those organizations that can play to this desire for self-actualization, that recognize the need to become our better selves, will reap the benefits. Command- and control-driven organizations will, by their nature, drive performance from the level of meeting physiological needs of safety and property. Those organizations that treat their members with respect, recognizing their talents and contributions, will enable their members with the freedom to be their best, and in so doing, will make better organizations because of it.

What kind of organization are you building? A safe place? Or a place to become your best self? If you’re interested in more innovation, it had best be the latter.

Read More

Design Thinking Applied – Network of Leadership Scholars & Primed Associates, LLC. Partnering

Primed Associates, LLC. is partnering with the Network of Leadership Scholars, a virtual community within the Academy of Management, to bring scholars and representatives from enterprise together to address real organization issues. Drew Marshall, Principal with Primed Associates will be facilitating a series of challenge-focused sessions using elements of the design thinking process. This conference is to take place on August 10-11, 2011 immediately prior to the annual meetings of the Academy of Management in San Antonio, Texas (August 12-16, 2011).

Our shared goal (in organizing this pre-conference conference) is to enable lively conversations around real issues faced by companies within three inter-connected dimensions: leadership, innovation and sustainability. Our hope is that the research designs and solutions that are generated as a result of these focused conversations will lead to collaborative solutions, potential research projects at the companies, and will lead to wider adoption of evidence-based practice. As one of the organizers, Nagaraj Sivasubramaniam (Associate Professor of Leadership, Department of Management in the Palumbo-Donahue Schools of Business at Duquesne University) noted, “Far too often, academics and practitioners talk past each other, and in attempting to bridge this divide, we hope we can realize the full potential of academic-practitioner collaboration.”

To address this divide, the desire is to capture the spirit of the network – collaborative conversations about issues we care about deeply. To increase the value of these conversations, it was decided to invite companies/public institutions to present a challenge they are grappling with, invite scholars to serve as a subject-matter experts, and utilize a facilitated design thinking framework to explore potentially break-through outcomes.

Participating enterprise organizations are bring challenges to the table such as: developing and leading virtual teams, talent management in quasi-governmental agencies, the application of complexity theory in leadership development, and leadership development to address the void created by the simultaneous planned retirement of a firms group of founders. We will have a mix of academics and practitioners – including participants from additional enterprises who will be participating but not bringing key issues to address. There will also be a blend of different research interests/expertise present as well as several participants from Europe, Asia and Australia, giving this a fairly diverse flavor.

Look for an update in August following the conclusion of this exciting event.

Read More

Innovation Illusions: It’s not the idea it’s the action – innovation only exists when value is created in the market

Creativity. Invention. These are core elements in the process of innovation. They are not innovation itself. Mistakenly identifying them as innovation creates confusion and dissatisfaction. An idea, fully formed, but not realized in any tangible manner, creates little value. It might spur other invention or other creativity, but unless it is directly applied to meeting a particular need or providing a solution to a defined challenge, it cannot be labeled innovation.

 

What can this piece of paper do; Imagine?

-       Alamgir Hashmi

Mistakenly regarding something shiny and new as an innovation is commonplace. Innovations are concrete and make a meaningful difference to a user. That doesn’t mean all innovations are serious or universally appealing. I give you exhibit A: the Slap Chop. (Note: I’m not linking to the official Slap Chop site as the number of pop-up ads is a nightmare. Think: “innovation as annoyance.”) This device, one in a long line of “As Seen on TV” kitchen gadgets, is designed to save one from the drudgery of using a knife to actually, well, cut things. As an innovation it’s not a big stretch, but somebody somewhere must consider it of value: it’s one of the biggest-selling gadgets in recent years. Its popularity has also given rise to fantastic remixes of its commercials, such as DJ Steve Porter’s YouTube hit.

Infomercial lunacy aside, the Slap Chop demonstrates what has to happen to an idea before it can be considered an innovation: it must make it into users’ hands.

 

Ideas as a false focus

It is our illusions that create the world.

-       Didier Cauwelaert

For many intent on fostering innovation in their organization, the front end (i.e., ideation) is most likely their primary target. The reasons for this are many: it’s easier to engage with the generation of ideas than the work of implementing them; the notion of producing ideas gives a false sense of accomplishment (“Look, I filled up the whole whiteboard/easel sheet/napkin. I rock”); and it’s simpler to pitch idea creation as a sign of innovation success to senior leaders and peers, especially when looking for a quick victory.

The ongoing pursuit of idea generation means that we neglect to build the infrastructure necessary to support their systematic and repeatable production for customers (be they paying customers in the marketplace or internal customers). Ideas are valuable only in relation to the problem they solve for a particular constituency. If there is no human target for your ideas, what’s the point? Action is required, the kind of action that breathes life into an idea, that makes it useful and of value, that requires more than the appearance of effort. Usually that effort is provided by more than one person.

 

Many hands make faster, lighter, easier work

The greatest obstacle to discovering the shape of the earth, the continents, and the oceans was not ignorance but the illusion of knowledge.

-       Daniel J. Boorstin

Often we think we know more than we actually do. A while ago, we posted on the topic of fundamental attribution error. In that post we described how easy it is to delude yourself into behaving as though you have all the answers. If you are only concerned with the generation of ideas, the notion that you should be concerned with their utility in the market would be quite foreign to you. Many people and organizations fall into the trap of doing the same thing that worked before over and over again, even when the circumstances are no longer appropriate.

Inventors invent. Because people are more likely to take the actions indicated by the thinking foremost in their minds, coming up with “wild and crazy ideas,” this means that people whose perception has been affected by intense subjectivity are more likely to think of and take actions that underestimate the effects of relationships and interactions. They have an illusion of progress without all that horrible effort. (Yes, that is sarcasm.)

Neglecting relationships and interactions also reinforces the “ivory tower” syndrome, the idea that only a single great mind can come up with the truly world-changing idea. Thomas Edison, the great American innovator renowned for his amazing ability to produce inventions, was no lone player. While he took sole credit for many inventions, people fail to realize the wealth of additional resources he had at hand to produce his ideas. His Menlo Park laboratory was a hive of industrious activity with men (mostly men) producing prototypes of his ideas and experiments to test his theories. Edison knew the value in an idea was the ability to deliver it to market. And he was tenacious about delivering.

That perspective runs completely counter to the creative genius of Nikola Tesla, an Edison rival, who died alone, in debt, in a New York hotel room. Tesla decried the scale of Edison’s efforts in producing his innovations, he saw it as wasteful, yet history bears out the greater impact of the more productive man.

 

A culture of creativity tied to a culture of execution

A really great talent finds its happiness in execution.

-       Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Sharing the creative process with others in a collaborative manner can unlock ideas and bring them to market faster and with greater impact. It requires an organizational mindset that binds idea generation tightly to their execution and delivery to meet users’ needs. This requires a resilience and flexibility that accommodates different perspectives, synthesizes them, and integrates them into a common purpose. Rather than being focused on the declaration of impossibility, for innovation to succeed it must take a leaf out of the improviser’s playbook and adopt the art of the possible.

In improv, the phrase “Yes, and…” is used to begin responses to an idea that’s been offered by other actors, driving creative outcomes. The original idea is merely the starting point, a place for departure— it is not the destination. To treat the idea as the hardest part (or the most valuable part) of an innovation is to be led into a false sense of security. It offers the illusion of success. Those with more experience as innovators know the truth.

With an idea in hand, they recognize that the hard work is about to begin.

Read More